Skip to main content

Is plant-based food really better for the planet?

Answers whether plant-based food is genuinely better for the planet, summarising the evidence and explaining how Huel approaches sustainability.

Written by Jamie Forbes

The research consistently shows that plant-based foods generally have a lower environmental impact than animal-based foods — though the picture is nuanced depending on the specific food and how it is produced.


The Evidence

Environmental Factor

Plant-Based

Animal-Based

Greenhouse gas emissions

Generally lower

Generally higher — particularly beef, lamb, and dairy

Land use

Generally lower

Generally higher — livestock farming requires significantly more land

Water use

Generally lower

Generally higher — animal products require more water to produce per calorie


Why the Difference?

Animal agriculture requires growing crops to feed livestock, which adds an additional layer of resource use before food reaches the plate. Plant-based foods bypass this step — meaning fewer resources are used per meal.

Livestock farming also produces methane — a potent greenhouse gas — which contributes significantly to agriculture's overall climate impact.


How Huel Approaches This

  • All Huel products are 100% plant-based

  • Huel measures the carbon footprint of its products to understand and reduce its environmental impact

  • Huel uses lower-impact ingredients such as oats, peas, and flaxseed — selected for both their nutritional value and environmental credentials


An Important Nuance

Not all plant-based foods are equally sustainable — production methods, transport, and packaging all play a role. Huel's approach focuses on making genuinely lower-impact choices across the full supply chain, not just the ingredient list.


Want to know more about Huel's sustainability approach? Say "talk to a human" and our team will be happy to help.

Did this answer your question?